Re: ????

James Vahn (
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 20:59:02 -0800 (PST)

On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> It's not. Nowhere in FTS-0009 there is a requirement that the first
> token is a 4D address, nor is suggested that this address should be
> used for replies instead of the one in the origin.

No argument from me on that, but it just doesn't make sense to use
another network's addressing scheme when the right one is at hand.
All it's doing for me is causing problems. Would make just as much
sense, maybe more, to use my zipcode in there.