Re: ????

Marco d'Itri (
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 20:36:41 +0100

On Nov 10, James Vahn <> wrote:

>Point it out to them and all you'll get is a slow blink; they don't
>understand (nor do I) why an RFC-style address is in there. It's just
>as broken as they are. Wrong network.
It's not. Nowhere in FTS-0009 there is a requirement that the first
token is a 4D address, nor is suggested that this address should be
used for replies instead of the one in the origin.